Even if you get excluded, you might still have a chance to win


It might be the case that also the rest of the tenders should be excluded. 

Then, hypothetically, the procurement entity should cancel the procedure and may publicise a new contract notice where you have the possibility to partake. 

According to a judgement from the European Court of Justice, C‑333/18, this hypothetical scenario gives you a legitimate reason to challenge the award to see if your competitors in fact should be excluded.

Read the entire case here



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

🎧 A musical break with AI :)

Image
  An country song about public procurement   [Verse] In a town where the roads are dusty and worn, Folks gather 'round when a new day's born, With a clipboard in hand and a thoughtful plan, It's time to see who'll lend a helping hand.   [Verse 2] On the courthouse steps, they post the call, For contractors big, and farmers small, From fixing fences to paving streets, It's the lifeblood of this community heat.   [Chorus] It's a bid for love in a tiny town, Where hard work's king, and the heart is bound, In every handshake and every deal, It's public procurement with a hometown feel.   [Verse 3] Meet old Joe, he's the man with the trucks, Turns on a dime and never ducks, With a twinkle in his eye, he makes his bid, Says, "I'll dig those ditches like my Daddy did."   [Bridge] Where trust is built on faith and pride, Nobody's got a thing to hide, With a glance and a nod, they kno
Read more

Nuances from the ECJ on the prohibition to negotiat in a case of partial offers

 In the judgment C-737/22 the European Court of Justice made som nuances in the classification of negotiation.   In the case, a central government purchasing unit in Denmark had published a competition on 4 February 2020 for a framework agreement about library material with preparatory services. The award was to be given to the provider with the lowest price. For reasons of competition, the contract was divided into separat lots; east and west. In the tender documents, the procuring entity wrote that the tenderer who offered the lowest price would be awarded the contract for the west.  Furthermore, that the tenderer ranked as No. 2 would be offered the contract for the east, under the condition that the price for the east contract was reduced to the price for the west contract. ECJ states that this possibility was regulated in the tender documents. It was not possible to negotiate the price up or down compared to prices submitted before the offer deadline expired. There was therefo
Read more